English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article examines national regulations relating to the recognition of names in official documents by focusing on Article 21 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, having particular regard to the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the case of  Runevič-Vardyn and Wardyn . It also assesses the potential impact that this and other cases before the  ecj  and the European Court of Human Rights may exert on national minorities. The recognition of names is not regulated in European Union law; thus, the  eu  member states may freely determine the usage of names in official documents, as the state language represents a constitutional value and part of the national identity of many  eu  member states. Therefore, only regulation of names that causes excessive interference with the exercise of freedom of movement or respect for private and family life is unlawful under  eu  law. This issue will also be discussed in light of Article 4(2) of the Treaty on the European Union, by which the  ecj  assesses these types of interference with the  eu ’s duty to respect the national identities of its member states.

The Right to a Name Versus National Identity in the Context of eu Law: The Case of Lithuania