English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Exodus 3:14–15 provide an answer to Moses’ question in v. 13, but with surprising unanimity scholars have concluded that v. 14 is the heart of the section due to the supposed significance of the name  Yhwh  for the determining  Yhwh ’s original character. This focus on v. 14 has led most scholars to overlook the fact that v. 15a is a second answer to the question, and that v. 15b presents two complementary, but distinct dimensions of the deity. In v. 15b, the demonstratives  וזה  ‪…‬  זה , the nouns  שמי  and  זכרי , and the temporal adverbial compounds  לעלם  and  לדר דר , each point toward two distinct referents:  Yhwh  and Elohim. The first clause highlights the timeless nature of  Yhwh ’s name, while the second clause underscores the need to memorialize Elohim as the God of the ancestors and future Israelite generations.

Not the Name Alone: A Linguistic Study of Exodus 3:14–15