English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Strumia’s presentation at CERN in 2018 (Strumia, 2018) rightly drew widespread condemnation from the physics and wider scientific community (Guardian, 2018; Independent, 2018), including a petition with over 4,000 signatures, mainly from physicists (www.particlesforjustice .org). His article in this issue corrects the major flaws in the bibliometric part of his argument and contextualizes the results better in terms of confounding factors that differently affect men and women. Below I comment only on the published article and not on the presentation. To be honest, I found the presentation slides (I did not hear the talk) so offensive in style that I do not want to comment on the one important point in the slides that I agreed with.

Female contributions to high-energy physics in a wider context: Commentary on an article by Strumia