English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

We discuss Kochan's recent criticism of the work of Joseph Rouse (Kochan 2011). We argue that Kochan fails to show that both Rouse's own work and his Heidegger interpretation are plagued by insurmountable problems. We also try to locate the deeper, meta-philosophical reasons that are responsible for what we take to be Kochan's misreading of Rouse's work. This allows us to throw some light on the standoff that so often seems to characterize debates on scientific realism

Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism