English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background: In preclinical models, the pannexin-1 channel has been shown to be involved in blood pressure regulation through an effect on peripheral vascular resistance. Pannexin-1 releases ATP, which can activate constrictive purinergic receptors on the smooth muscle cells. Pannexin-1 opening is proposed to be mediated by α-adrenergic receptors to potentiate sympathetic constriction. This positions pannexin-1 as a putative pharmacological target in blood pressure regulation in humans. The aim was to provide the first translational evidence for a role of pannexin-1 in essential hypertension in humans by use of an advanced invasive mechanistic approach. Methods: Middle-aged stage-1 hypertensive (n=13; 135.7±6.4 over 83.7±3.7 mm Hg) and normotensive men (n=12; 117.3±5.7 over 72.2±3.5 mm Hg) were included. Blood pressure and leg vascular resistance were determined during femoral arterial infusion of tyramine (α-adrenergic receptor stimulation), sodium nitroprusside, and acetylcholine. Measurements were made during control conditions and with pannexin-1 blockade (3000 mg probenecid). Expression of Pannexin-1, purinergic- and α-adrenergic receptors in skeletal muscle biopsies was determined by Western blot. Results: The changes in leg vascular resistance in response to tyramine (+289% versus +222%), sodium nitroprusside (−82% versus −78%) and acetylcholine (−40% versus −44%) infusion were not different between the 2 groups (P &gt;0.05) and pannexin-1 blockade did not alter these variables (P &gt;0.05). Expression of pannexin-1 and of purinergic- and α-adrenergic receptors was not different between the 2 groups (P &gt;0.05).Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, the data demonstrate that pannexin-1 does not contribute to the elevated blood pressure in essential hypertension, a finding, which also opposes that reported in preclinical models.

Is the Pannexin-1 Channel a Mechanism Underlying Hypertension in Humans? a Translational Study of Human Hypertension