English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

November 26, 2019 1773 James A. de Lemos, MD L. Kristin Newby, MD, MHS Nicholas L. Mills, MD, PhD The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) 1 classifies myocardial infarction (MI) into 5 subtypes, of which type 1 and type 2 MI are the most common and relevant to practicing clinicians. Type 1 MI is defined as MI caused by acute atherothrombotic mechanisms, with type 2 MI defined as MI resulting from myocardial oxygen supply/demand mismatch without acute atherothrombosis. The UDMI recognizes multiple potential causes of type 2 MI, including demand-side abnormalities such as tachyarrhythmia or severe hypertension, and supply-side issues such as severe anemia, hypoxemia, or hypotension. Type 2 MI may occur with or without obstructive coronary disease, with the threshold for type 2 MI lower in patients with fixed obstructive coronary artery disease. Type 2 MI is common and is associated with substantial risk for cardiac (and noncardiac) death and major adverse cardiac events.2 Research to date has been limited largely to observational studies that have used varying definitions and adjudication criteria for type 2 MI, focusing on prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis, with almost no data on treatment.2 Recently, an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code was introduced for type 2 MI, and it is hoped that this will facilitate research using administrative data.3 However, we believe that the current definition for type 2 MI is too phenotypically heterogeneous to permit adequate study or reliable coding by hospital administrators. It is important to note that the UDMI includes, under the umbrella of type 2 MI, several acute coronary processes that obstruct blood flow, including spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), coronary embolism, and coronary vasospasm. We believe that these specific diagnoses are a poor fit in the category of type 2 MI; from both a pathophysiological and clinical perspective, they are more closely aligned with type 1 MI. SCAD, coronary embolism, and vasospasm are acute supply-side obstructive processes that have clinical presentations and initial diagnostic and management approaches that are similar to type 1 MI. They are usually spontaneous presentations, without an obvious precipitating event. These conditions typically are initially triaged as suspected acute coronary syndromes, treated with guideline-recommended therapies for acute coronary syndromes, and evaluated with early coronary imaging. The diagnosis is usually made in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, with subsequent treatment determined by findings from coronary imaging. In contrast, most other etiologies causing type 2 MI, including severe tachycardia and hypertension, anemia, and hypoxemia, are apparent at the time of clinical presentation, and diagnosed based on clinical criteria, with coronary angiography delayed or deferred. Applying the same diagnosis of type 2 MI to such phenotypically distinct patients has clear disadvantages for clinical management, and negatively impacts the quality of research into type 2 MI. Reporting the epidemiology, outcomes, © 2019 The Authors. Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. ON MY MIND

A Proposal for Modest Revision of the Definition of Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction