English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Activation mapping of scar-related atrial tachycardias (ATs) can be difficult to interpret because of inaccurate time annotation of complex electrograms and passive diastolic activity. We examined whether integration of a vector map can help to describe patterns of propagation to better explain the mechanism and location of ATs. Methods: The investigational mapping algorithm calculates vectors and applies physiological constraints of electrical excitation in human atrial tissue to determine the arrhythmia source and circuit. Phase I consisted of retrospective evaluation in 35 patients with ATs. Phase II consisted of prospective validation in 20 patients with ATs. Macroreentry was defined as a continuous propagation in a circular path &gt;30 mm; localized reentry was defined as a circular path ≤30 mm; a focal source had a centrifugal spread from a point source. Results: In phase I, standard activation mapping identified 28 of 40 ATs (70%): 25 macroreentry and 3 focal tachycardias. In the remaining 12 ATs, the mechanism and location could not be identified by activation and required entrainment or empirical ablation for termination (radiofrequency time, 17.3±6.6 minutes). In comparison, the investigational algorithm identified 37 of 40 (92.5%) ATs, including 5 macroreentry, 3 localized reentry, and 1 focal AT not identified by standard mapping. It also predicted the successful termination site of all 37 of 40 ATs. In phase II, the investigational algorithm identified 12 macroreentry, 6 localized reentry, and 2 focal tachycardias that all terminated with limited ablation (3.2±1.7 minutes). It identified 3 macroreentry, 3 localized reentry, and 1 focal AT not well characterized by standard mapping. The diagnosis of localized reentry was supported by highly curved vectors, resetting with increasing curve and termination with limited ablation (22±6 s). Conclusions: Activation mapping integrating vectors can help determine the arrhythmia mechanism and identify its critical components. It has particular value for identifying complex macroreentrant circuits and for differentiating a focal source from a localized reentry.

circulation. arrhythmia and electrophysiology

Activation Mapping With Integration of Vector and Velocity Information Improves the Ability to Identify the Mechanism and Location of Complex Scar-Related Atrial Tachycardias