z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Relationship of contractile state to ejection performance in patients with chronic aortic valve disease.
Author(s) -
Thomas Wisenbaugh,
David T. Booth,
Anthony N. DeMaria,
Steven E. Nissen,
John Waters
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/01.cir.73.1.47
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , ejection fraction , afterload , regurgitation (circulation) , stenosis , aortic valve , aortic valve stenosis , hemodynamics , heart failure
To assess the relative contributions of afterload mismatch and impaired contractility to pump dysfunction in patients with chronic aortic valve disease, simultaneous left ventricular cineangiography and micromanometry were performed in 56 patients: 21 with severe aortic stenosis, 16 with severe aortic regurgitation, and 19 normal control subjects. Left ventricular mass was increased in patients with aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation (172 +/- 52 and 224 +/- 63 g/m2, respectively, vs 89 +/- 16 for control subjects; p less than .05) as were end-diastolic volume (101 +/- 39 and 167 +/- 44 vs 77 +/- 16 ml/m2; p less than .05) and end-systolic volume (50 +/- 40 and 84 +/- 43 vs 24 +/- 7 ml/m2; p less than .05). Although ejection fraction was depressed in both abnormal groups (0.56 +/- 0.18 for patients with aortic stenosis and 0.53 +/- 0.13 for those with aortic regurgitation vs 0.69 +/- 0.05 for control subjects; p less than .05), the decrease in ejection fraction was disproportionate to the mild degree of afterload mismatch (end ejection stress 129 +/- 17 in patients with aortic stenosis and 154 +/- 58 in those with aortic regurgitation vs 117 +/- 46 kdyn/cm2 in control subjects; p = NS) with 10 of 21 patients with aortic stenosis and 12 of 16 patients with aortic regurgitation falling below the 95% prediction limit of the linear inverse relationship between ejection fraction and end-systolic stress for controls (EF = 0.78 - 0.00074 X ESS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom