English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The significance and treatment of ventricular premature beats (VPBs) in patients without sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), sudden death, or syncope remains unclear. We undertook a prospective study of programmed electrical stimulation (up to two extrastimuli and burst pacing) in 73 patients (age 60 +/- 10 years) with high-grade VPBs who had no evidence of sustained VT, sudden death, or syncope as determined by 48 hr of monitoring in the cardiac care unit and 48 hr Holter monitoring. Fifty-six patients (76.7%) had atherosclerotic heart disease, 10 (13.7%) had cardiomyopathy or valvular heart disease, and seven (9.6%) had no evident heart disease. Thirty-seven patients (50.7%) had Lown grade IVB VPBs, 30 (41.1%) had Lown grade IVA VPBs, and six (8.2%) had Lown grade III VPBs. Programmed electrical stimulation identified two groups of subjects: group 1 comprised 20 patients (27%) in whom VT or ventricular fibrillation was induced, group 2 comprised 53 patients (73%) in whom no ventricular arrhythmia or only two to four repetitive ventricular responses were induced. There was a significant difference between the presence of atherosclerotic heart disease, old myocardial infarction, and ejection fraction of less than 40% in group 1 compared with group 2. However, there was no significant difference in the grade of VPBs between the two groups. Seventeen of 20 patients from group 1 were placed on antiarrhythmic therapy (defined by programmed electrical stimulation), whereas group 2 patients were randomly assigned to prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy. A total of 70 patients were followed up for 30 +/- 15 months. The incidence of sustained VT and/or sudden death (31.5% vs 2%; p less than .001) was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Programmed electrical stimulation in patients with high-grade ventricular ectopy: electrophysiologic findings and prognosis for survival.