English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent studies indicate that in patients with muscular subaortic stenosis at rest, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is associated with severe systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior mitral leaflet and prolonged SAM-septal contact. We correlated the temporal relationships between echocardiographic and hemodynamic events in 18 patients with muscular subaortic stenosis (gradient of 73 ± 18 mm Hg [mean ± SD]). After the ECG R wave, aortic ejection began at 72 ± 12 msec and the onset ofSAM 23 msec later, at 95 ± 22 msec. The onset of the pressure gradient at 162 ± 22 msec after the R wave was almost simultaneous with the onset of SAM-septal contact at 168 ± 28 msec. SAM-septal contact was maintained for 195 msec and ceased at 363 41 msec after the R wave. Peak posterior left ventricular wall movement occurred at 387 ± 48 msec, 219 msec after peak SAM (the onset of SAM-septal contact). The excursion and mean rate of development of SAM from onset to septal contact (14 ± 2 mm and' 208 ± 55 mm/sec, respectively) were almost three times the excursion and mean rate of inward movement of the posterior wall in the s'ame period of systole (5 ± 1 mm and 75 ± -16 mmlsec, respectively). In terms of the systolic ejection period, SAM'began at 6.0 6%, and the onset of the pressure gradient and SAM-septal contact were almost simultaneous, at 23 ± 5% and 25 ± 7%, throughout this period. The end of SAM-septal contact occurred at 76 10% of the systolic ejection period and peak posterior left ventricular wall movement occurred at 82 12%. We conclude that the onset ofSAM is a very early systolic event. The onset of the pressure gradient occurs just before or with the onset of SAM-septal contact, suggesting a cause-and-effect relationship. Posterior wall hyperkinesis plays no part in the genesis of SAM in these patients, judging by the differing rate and extent of excursion of SAM and the posterior wall and thefact- that peak left ventricular wall movement occurs 219 msec after peak SAM (onset of SAM-septal contact). Tethering of the anterior mitral leaflet by the papillary muscles is not the cause of SAM, since SAM-septal contact ceases at 76 ± 10% of the systolic ejection period, whereas a tethering effect should last until end-systole. SAM is most likely caused by a Venturi effect related to rapid early' systolic ejection.

Muscular subaortic stenosis: the temporal relationship between systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral leaflet and the pressure gradient.