z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary and Recommendations
Author(s) -
Kim A. Eagle,
Robert A. Guyton,
Ravin Davidoff,
Gordon A. Ewy,
James D. Fonger,
Timothy J. Gardner,
John Parker Gott,
Howard C. Herrmann,
Robert A. Marlow,
William C. Nugent,
Gerald T. O’Connor,
Thomas A. Orszulak,
Richard E. Rieselbach,
William L. Winters,
Salim Yusuf,
Raymond J. Gibbons,
Joseph S. Alpert,
Arthur Garson,
Gabriel Gregoratos,
Richard O. Russell,
Thomas J. Ryan,
Sidney C. Smith
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/01.cir.100.13.1464
Subject(s) - medicine , coronary artery bypass surgery , cardiology , artery , executive summary , surgery , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Task Force on Practice Guidelines was formed to make recommendations regarding the appropriate use of diagnostic tests and therapies for patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is among the most common operations performed in the world and accounts for more resources expended in cardiovascular medicine than any other single procedure. Since the original Guidelines were published in 1991, there has been considerable evolution in the surgical approach to coronary disease, and at the same time there have been advances in preventive, medical, and percutaneous catheter approaches to therapy. These revised guidelines are based on a computerized search of the English literature since 1989, a manual search of final articles, and expert opinion.As with other ACC/AHA guidelines, this document uses ACC/AHA classifications I, II, and III as summarized below:Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective. Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness or efficacy of a procedure. Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy. Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion. Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful. A. Hospital OutcomesSeven core variables (priority of operation, age, prior heart surgery, sex, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction [EF], percent stenosis of the left main coronary artery, and number of major coronary arteries with significant stenoses) are the most consistent predictors of mortality after coronary artery surgery. The greatest risk is correlated with the urgency of operation, advanced age, and 1 or more prior coronary bypass surgeries. Additional variables that are related …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom