English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The effects of water stress in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.) Brazil is the second largest producer of soybean and its plantation areas are located in regions with very different rainfall patterns. Thus, this study aimed to study the effects of water stress in soybean, caused by lack of water and excess, occurring both in the total cycle as individually in the most important stages of the culture. The experiment was conducted in the Biosystems Engineering Department, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture ESALQ / USP, in Piracicaba SP, in the period of December 2011 to March 2013, two crops of soybeans have been harvested (2011/2012 harvest and 2012/2013 harvest). Covering a greenhouse equipped with 48 boxes with controlled drainage, 1.1 m wide by 1.3 m long and 0.75 m deep was used. The reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was calculated by Penman Montheith FAO. The experiment was done in randomized blocks design with 4 replications. For the application of the treatments, the crop cycle was divided into four sub-periods: S1 (All of Vegetative Stage); S2 (Beginning Bloom until Full Pod); S3 (Beginning Seed until Full Seed); S4 (Beginning Maturity until Full Maturity). In 2011/2012 harvest, the cultivar was BRS 316 EMBRAPA – RR (V1). The planting was done on December 12, 2011, and harvested in April 10, 2012. The treatments consisted of three irrigation levels, Deficit (50% ETc); Excess (150% ETc) and Full irrigation (100% ETc) ranging in 12 different forms of occurrence: Deficit in total cycle; Deficit only in S1; Deficit only in S2; Deficit only in S3; Deficit only in S4; Excess in total cycle; Excess only in S1; Excess only in S2, Excess only in S3; Excess only in S4 and Full Irrigation. When they were not passing through the sub period of application of the treatment, the plot was irrigation with full irrigation. Excess was not detrimental to any of the variant. However the deficit applied during grain filling resulted in significant productivity losses. As for the 2012/2013 harvest, the soybean variety used was BMX POTEMCIA RR (V2). The planting was done in November 6, 2012, and the harvest in March, 8, 2013. In this case the treatments consisted of four irrigation levels (30, 50, 100 and 150% of ETc) applied in each one of the four sub-periods of culture. The deficit of 50% (moderate) was called D1 and the deficit of 70% (Severe) was called D2. Thus, treatments with 50% deficit occurring in 4 subperiods and Full Cycle (CT) were: D1S1V2, D1S2V2, D1S3V2, D1S4V2, D1CTV2. Likewise, the treatments with 70% deficit were called: D2S1V2, D2S2V2, D2S3V2, D2S4V2 and D2CTV2. There was also a treatment with excess (150% ETc) called E1CTV2 and control treatment with Full irrigation (IPCTV2). The results showed that the water depths of Deficit reduced productivity when applied in full cycle. However, when applied only in subperiods showed no significant differences compared to full irrigation.

Os efeitos do estresse hídrico na cultura da soja (Glycine Max, (L.) Merrill.)