English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article aims to defend the legitimacy of the fundamental principles and values, especially expropriating the legality, morality, reasonableness and proportionality as rational criteria to cope with the administrative-technical expert examination in certain cases of inadmissibility in public service from the perspective of strict infra-legal norms without a normative systematic look to ensure the fundamental rights of the winner and named in a public contest over the administrative act of disability. Thus, the study built with basis in exegesis of legal paternal to the principles of maximum effectiveness of constitutional norms, the reasonableness and proportionality, true vectors interpretive rationalization in the elucidation of the subject.

Aspectos racionais limitantes de suposta discricionariedade administrativa à admissão no serviço público ante os princípios e valores fundamentais