English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper presents and reexamines the discussion regarding the identification of the legal interest actually protected by the laws enacted to fight against money laundering critically. The need for a new study of this subject is set forth specially in view of the analysis of the alternatives defended in theory, which reach from the legal interest protected by the predicate offense, the administration of justice and the economical order as a whole to the thesis according to which these laws create a “plurioffensive” crime. In order to enable an analysis which is not strictly limited to theory, this paper relates the studied theories to Brazilian reality, and, therefore, with Act n. 9.613, of March 3 rd , 1998. The abovementioned suggestions are analyzed and the solutions they propose are questioned, in the search of alternatives. The present paper ends with a first criticism to the penal symbolism which may be identified in the laws enacted for the fight against money laundering.

O bem jurídico protegido pela Lei n. 9.613 de 1988: primeiras críticas