English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The objective of this research is to analyze, through the discursive practices of actors linked to a parachurch organization called Tribal Generation, positions of certain agents to justify themselves as legitimate Christians. Our question turns to the understanding of the conditions necessary for a church to exist and to legitimize as such. This question helps us to analyze the disputes over the classification of what would be the church, revealing the parameters of their discursive construction as a 'legitimate' way emic term that reiterates what can be understood as a church and, consequently, as a religion. To understand these questions, we try to structure this thesis in two planes. The first plan was to map a network of actors, churches, ministries and missionary schools from the Tribal Generation, an organization that acts as a virtual platform that brings and as a proposal "to encourage an inclusive model of churches with more flexible leadership facing the contemporary diversity". Assume assumption that the doctrinal content remains "conservative" about the discursive use of texts that make up the bible. The second plan was about the mapping of a sub-network of actors, churches and missionary schools that focus on the "evangelization and conversion" of individuals who identify themselves as homosexual. This "pastoral network of sexuality" category we use to circumscribe the subnet, helped us understand how the discursive use of "inclusion and diversity" does not necessarily positive homosexuality as a legitimate sexual identity. These categories, along with proposals for new forms of ecclesiological and outreach activities, call into dispute the legitimacy of the actors. This dispute is undertaken in the field of sexuality, showing distinct discursive forms in interaction. Key-words: religion, networks, sexuality, discursive practices, justification

Flexibilizando estéticas, restringindo sexualidades: disputas de agentes pela demarcação do religioso