English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The financial resources of the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) for the purchase of food, including products from family farming (FF), can be managed centrally (by the State or city government), school-based, or mixed (State or city manager and school). Objective To describe and analyze the characteristics of the implementation of the purchasing from family farming, according to the management modalities of the School Feeding Program and the characteristics of municipalities of São Paulo state. Methods Descriptive crosssectional study with quantitative analysis, involving a sample of 25 municipalities in São Paulo, who have purchased products from family farming in 2012 for school feeding purposes. In 2013, interviews were conducted with the school principal and a school cook of 105 schools in those municipalities. Were analyzed the following characteristics of the implementation: knowledge of Law 11.947/2009, dissemination of the purchasing process with the school community, institutional support (guidance on food management to the school principal, training with school cooks, improvements in kitchen structure, variety of food), delivery of foods and the use of resources from PNAE with the acquisition from FF ≥ 30%. For the description of the implementation, absolute and relative frequencies were used and, to verify association, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, with significance level of p<0,05. Results – Out of the 25 municipalities, 20 (80%) had centralized management of school feeding and 5 (20%) had school/ mixed management. The percentage of school principal who knew the Law 11.947/2009 was higher in centralized management (p =0,010); the percentage of disclosure of the purchasing process was higher in school/ mixed management (p=0,010); there was no association between institutional support actions and PNAE management; 35% of the centrally managed municipalities reached the 30% minimum use of resources with FF, while all of the school/ mixed management reached (p=0,015). About the implementation and characteristics of the municipalities, the following associations were found: dissemination of the purchasing process with the number of students (p=0,038) and the municipality's Gross Domestic Product (p = 0,020); guidance to the school principal and the population of the municipality (p = 0,011), number of public schools (p = 0,040) and GDP (p=0,003); training and the population (p=0,005); greater variety of food and the population (p=0,027), number of students (p =0,025), territorial area (p=0,025) and the Municipal Human Development Index (p=0,001). The 30% minimum use of resources with FF was associated with: dissemination of the FF purchasing process (p =0,003), improvements in kitchen structure (p =0,039), training (p=0,020) and greater variety (p =0,004); there was no association with municipal characteristics. Conclusions The centralized management was the most prevalent in the municipalities of São Paulo and showed greater frequency of knowledge of Law 11.947/2009 by the school principal. In school/ mixed management, the dissemination of purchasing process was more frequent and all municipalities reached the 30% minimum use of resources from PNAE with the acquisition from FF. Institutional support actions predominated in small municipalities and were associated with the use of 30% of resources with FF. Descriptors: School feeding; family farming; National School Feeding Program; management. SUMÁRIO 1 INTRODUÇÃO  13 1.1 O PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE ALIMENTAÇÃO ESCOLAR  13 1.2 DESCENTRALIZAÇÃO DO PNAE  14 1.3 MODALIDADES DE GESTÃO DO PNAE  17 1.4 AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR E O PNAE  19 1.5 JUSTIFICATIVA  24 2 OBJETIVOS  25 2.1 OBJETIVO GERAL  25 2.2 OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS  25 3 MÉTODOS  26 3.1 ANTECEDENTES  26 3.2 DELINEAMENTO  26 3.3 LOCAL DE ESTUDO  26 3.4 DEFINIÇÃO DA AMOSTRA  27 3.5 INSTRUMENTOS, MÉTODOS DE COLETA E PROCESSAMENTO DOS DADOS  33 3.6 VARIÁVEIS DE ESTUDO  34 3.7 ANÁLISE DOS DADOS  40 3.8 ASPECTOS ÉTICOS  40 4 RESULTADOS  41 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DOS MUNICÍPIOS E DAS ESCOLAS  41 ENTIDADE EXECUTORA E MODALIDADES DE GESTÃO DO PROGRAMA DE ALIMENTAÇÃO ESCOLAR 42 CARACTERÍSTICAS DOS MUNICÍPIOS SEGUNDO MODALIDADE DE GESTÃO  42 CARACTERÍSTICAS DA IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA COMPRA DA AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR E ASSOCIAÇÃO COM A MODALIDADE DE GESTÃO DO PNAE  44 ASSOCIAÇÃO ENTRE DIVULGAÇÃO DO PROCESSO DE COMPRAS E AÇÕES DE APOIO INSTITUCIONAL E AS CARACTERÍSTICAS DOS MUNICÍPIOS47 ASSOCIAÇÃO ENTRE CARACTERÍSTICAS DOS MUNICÍPIOS, CARACTERÍSTICAS DA IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA COMPRA DA AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR, E A UTILIZAÇÃO DOS 30% DOS RECURSOS DO PNAE  53 5 DISCUSSÃO  56 6 CONCLUSÕES  65 7 CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS  67 8 REFERÊNCIAS  68 ANEXOS  77 Anexo 1 Questionário de identificação dos municípios que compraram diretamente da Agricultura Familiar para o PNAE em 2012 e identificação da modalidade de gestão  77 Anexo 2 – Questionário aplicado nas escolas  78 Anexo 3 – Questionário aplicado com o nutricionista Responsável Técnico do PNAE  84 Anexo 4 – Parecer de aprovação da pesquisa pelo Comitê de Ética  95 Anexo 5 Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido – TCLE  98 CURRÍCULO LATTES DA ALUNA  100 CURRÍCULO LATTES DA ORIENTADORA  101

Gestão do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar e a implementação da compra da agricultura familiar em municípios de São Paulo