English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Writing scientific papers in English, the língua franca of Science, is often a severe limitation for the career of many a non-native English user. In addition to difficulties in choosing appropriate sentences and collocations which appear with high frequency in scientific texts, non-natives also face problems related to interference from their mother tongue (L1 interference). In order to overcome some of these difficulties, we developed a leaming environment for scientific writing named AMADEUS (Amiable Article DEvelopment for User Support). AMADEUS targets the understanding of the diverse processes involved in the creation of successfill scientific papas. Its overall architecture embodies both advising and tutoring tools, which are called Reference, Support, Critic and Tutoring tools. The Critic Tool helps less-experienced writers to create sections of papers. The tool offers hints (or critiques) as to how better structure the section rather than offer a rigid frame of schematic and specific components for each section. It helps the writing of papers suitable for a purpose and specific audience (for example, the Artificial Intelligence community). The aim of this research is to explore the critiquing approach to teach the scientific writing used by a specific community. We present both, a model for the development of critiquing tools dedicated to the scientific writing and a model of documents which makes explicit the goals and idiosyncrasies of the target community. A prototype system lias been implemented and evaluated for the CHI community (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems). A critical analysis of the system's architecture and function focusses on two questions: does it work? and is it practical? To anwer the workability question, samples of the system's interaction with users with different writing backgrotmds are analyzed. To answer the practicality question, the extendibility, tailorability, portability, and cost-effectiveness of the system is studied.

A Abordagem de Críticas para a Construção de Sistemas de Aprendizado da Escrita Técnica