English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The method of air sparging is used for remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). In this process the air is injected into the soil in the saturated zone to ascend to the vadose zone and volatilizes the contaminants. The efficiency of air flow remediation is directly linked with the region of soil in which the flow occurs. This region is called as zone of influence and is affected by several factors such as: type and structure of the soil, permeability and pressure of injection. In the present work the air flow in saturated soils was investigated using a bidimensional physical model to evaluate the zone of influence formed. The objective of the tests was to obtain informations about zone of influence. A transparent tank made by acrylic plates was used. For these tests it was used three different types of soil: natural sand, called Osasco sand, a commercial and uniform sand called IPT sand and a residual soil used to create the lenses with low permeability. Laboratory tests such as water retention, minimum and maximum voids ratio, water and air permeability were performed to characterize the soils used in this study. Tests performed in the model (tank) showed, like those in the literature, that the particle size and soil structure are mainly responsible to create the preferential paths of air in soil. The zone of influence formed during the injection of air in the tests with Osasco sand was not symmetrical due to the heterogeneity of the soil; on the other hand the test performed with IPT sand was symmetrical due to its uniformity. The IPT sand showed a narrower zone of influence than Osasco sand, this was due to the lower porosity of the Osasco sand. Lower porosity imply in higher tortuosity and greater lateral expansion. Testes performed with low permeability lenses within the sand showed that small variations in the structure of the soil can affect the efficiency of the method because the region immediately above the lens is not reached by the air. The increase in the pressure of injection during the experiments induced the formation of more air channels causing an increase in the size of the zone of influence.

Estudo do fluxo de ar em solos usando a técnica de injeção de ar em modelos físicos bidimensionais.