English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chiossi JSC. Auditory steady-state response influence on cochlear implant auditory response [thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School; 2017. 73p. Background: The Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) is an electrophysiological exam that allows simultaneous and binaural frequency specific testing of hearing thresholds. Considering its objectivity, the test has been recommended for hearing loss diagnosis in young children. This possibility of early identification of hearing impairment is fundamental for minimizing handicaps caused by sensory deprivation and for planning proper intervention, for example, suggesting the use of cochlear implants (CI). The determination of the success of CI prognosis depends on several cofactors. Researchers suggest that residual hearing and hearing thresholds before CI surgery could allow auditory pathways preservation and enable the development of hearing abilities, as well as speech production skills, after the reestablishment of sensory input. Objective: To verify the relation between pre-operatory ASSR and post-CI auditory response in young children. Casuistic and Method: An observational retrospective study was conducted. Medical records were assessed in 47 children, younger than six years old at the CI surgery, diagnosed with sensorineural pre-linguistic hearing loss of profound degree. Information was collected about (a) audiological data – ASSR, ABR, behavioral audiometry, and other hearing loss aspects; (b) category of speech perception and oral language production before and after CI; (c) socioeconomics data and therapy attendance. Results: ASSR record was present in 34 (72.4%) children with mean threshold of 89.7 (10.2 SD) dB HL in the implanted ear, considering the frequencies of 0.5; 1; 2 and 4 kHz. Post-implant evaluation was conducted after a mean of 7.2 (2.1 SD) months of surgery. Then, 23 (49%) subjects enhanced one category of speech perception and four (8.5%) improved two categories, compared to previous evaluation. Field auditory threshold with CI was measure at 44.4 (12.4 SD) dB HL in mean, considering the frequencies of 0.5; 1; 2 and 4 kHz. Analyzing language expression development, 13 (27.6%) children improved their performance. To the age at CI surgery there was no correlation between ASSR thresholds and CI thresholds (p-value=0.338) or speech perception category (p-value=0.358) after CI. No correlation has been found between ASSR and expressive language development (p-value=0.095). Conclusion: There was no direct correlation between electrophysiological thresholds measured by ASSR and hearing response after CI, when analyzed behavioral CI threshold or speech perception.

A influência das respostas auditivas do estado estável nas respostas auditivas ao implante coclear