English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Housing policies to improve the quality of life of the poorest have been employed for a long time. In developing countries, such as Brazil, urbanization has increased the number of slums, encouraging the creation of housing programs. This is the case of the Minha Casa Minha Vida program, launched in 2009 in Brazil. Although the provision of quality housing tends to increase the welfare of the beneficiary families, studies have criticized the poor location of the program’s houses, generating doubts about the impact of the policy. Since the demand for housing is much larger than the supply, the poorest families in Minha Casa Minha Vida are randomly selected. This allowed us to divide individuals into treatment and control groups for the municipalities of Rio de Janeiro and São José do Rio Preto, in the state of São Paulo. By combining databases containing the individuals that were randomly selected and those who were not with administrative data from the Relatório Anual de Informações Sociais (RAIS) and the Cadastro Único we were able to measure the changes in the formal labor market for both groups. In addition, we also check the impact on participation in Bolsa Família, the country’s main social program. The results indicate that the program has negatively affected the labor supply, reducing the likelihood that the recipient will be formally employed. In addition, the program increased the proportion of families receiving the Bolsa Família program. This is one of the first articles to analyze microdata from Minha Casa Minha Vida, providing an important measure of the program’s impact. Key-words: public policies, housing policy, labor market. Lista de ilustrações Figura 1 – Unidades habitacionais contratadas no MCMV . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Figura 2 – Empreendimentos do MCMV no Rio de Janeiro Faixa I . . . . . . . . 32 Figura 3 – Rendimento mensal médio por setor censitário no Rio de Janeiro . . . . 32 Figura 4 – Distribuição dos postos de emprego formais no Rio de Janeiro por setor censitário . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Figura 5 – Localização dos beneficiários antes e depois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Figura 6 – Endereço dos beneficiários em São José do Rio Preto . . . . . . . . . . 41 Figura 7 – Distribuição dos postos de emprego formais em São José do Rio Preto . 42 Figura 8 – Efeito do programa sobre a probabilidade de emprego ao longo do tempo para cada sorteio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Figura 9 – Efeito do programa sobre a probabilidade de emprego e participação no Bolsa Família ao longo do tempo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

Política habitacional e a oferta de trabalho: evidências de sorteios do Minha Casa Minha Vida