English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper studies the policy that unified the admission system to Brazilian Higher Education. The policy consists of the reformulation of the Enem, in 2009, and the implementation of Sisu platform, in 2010. By using student level admission data from 2006 to 2014, this research seeks to investigate the impact of this policy on both the inter and intra state migration and on the dropout of students. We matched identified databases from the National Institute of Study and Research (Inep) to achieve a more accurate measure of student migration. We found that the admission of a given student in a program that offers places through SISU increases the probability of him being an interstate migrant by 2.9 percentage points (pp), but reduces the likelihood of him being a intrastate migrant by up to 3.95 pp. Concerning the results for dropout, we found that the university’s commitment to Sisu raises the first year dropout probability by 4.5 pp. In addition, a student who joins a program that offer places via Sisu is more likely to change to another institution before finishing his course. In this case, social aid is effective in keeping the student in the same institution, but not on the same course. Finally, we found that women are more stable in the sense of being less likely to migrate, to dropout or change institutions after their admission. Key-words: Higher Education, Sisu, Student migration, College dropout Lista de ilustrações Figura 1 – Taxas de escolarização bruta e líquida na educação superior – Brasil e Regiões 18 Figura 2 – Evolução das categorias administrativas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Figura 3 – Evolução do número de ingressantes e concluintes Por setor privado e público 20 Figura 4 – Evolução das inscrições no Enem e dos ingressos por vestibular ou Enem e outros processos de seleção . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Figura 5 – Descrição do processo Sisu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Figura 6 – Evolução dos números de inscritos, vagas ofertadas, instituições participantes e cursos com oferta de vagas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Figura 7 – Evolução dos fluxos entre regiões . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Figura 8 – Proporções médias de migrantes por região . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

O novo Enem e a plataforma Sisu: efeitos sobre a migração e a evasão estudantil