English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Where did the Tupian languages originate? How did they come to occupy their historical homelands? Jose Brochado (1984), filling in a major lacuna in Lathrap' s ( 1 970) scheme, has added a distinctive voice to the long-standing debates surrounding these questions. I am grateful to Francisco Noelli for bringing him to my attention. As Noelli indicates, Brochado' s work provides the foundations for dialog and cooperation between linguistics, cultural anthropology, and archaeology. It is in the spirit of cooperation and dialogue that I'll make some friendly criticisms of his research, as well as of the linguistic and cultural work pertinent to the question of Tupian origins. My purpose will be to pinpoint areas for further research that might provide clues for solving the continuing mystery surrounding the Tupl. I'll be concerned primarily with two principal hypotheses put forth by Brochado, the first deriving from Donald Lathrap, the second the novel contribution of Brochado himself:

On the geographical origins and dispersions of tupian languages