English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Two experiments, each with three sub-tests, examine the influences on lenis/ fortis perception of both preplosive F₀ (flat vs. rising) in monotone utterance intonation and of natural vs. synthetic speech quality. The German word ‘leiten’ [la&lt;sup&gt;e&lt;/sup&gt;tn], ‘to lead’, pronounced by a male and a female speaker [Experiments I and II, respectively), formed the basis for the test stimulus construction. The stop closure (= silence) was varied by the same 5 steps to yield a continuum from clear /t/ to clear /d/ in all tests. The data support the conclusion that a rising as opposed to a non-rising F₀ at the end of a preplosive vowel in a monotone utterance intonation increases /t/ perception. They also show that LPC synthesis quality is a strong additional cue for /t/, being stronger where it characterizes the whole utterance rather than only a small part of it. These influences on lenis/fortis perception are found to be consistent for the male and the female voice.

Prosodic Effects on Lenis/Fortis Perception: Preplosive F₀ and LPC Synthesis