English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Félix Arellano, MD, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, E-39008 Santander (Spain) Dear Sir, In a recent number of Nephron [1], Assadi and Chow-Tung state that ‘Persistent elevations in fractional excretion of beta-2-microglobulin (FEß2M) during gentamicin therapy... may reflect proximal tubule cell injury. Measures such as interrupting treatment or lowering the drug dosages are indicated if permanent damage is to be avoided’. The fact that aminoglycosides (AMG) increase the excretion of beta-2-microglobulin (ß2M) is well known [2, 3]. It is also recognized that measurement of this protein’s excretion in urine does not discern accurately between tubular damage induced by AMG or by other causes [4]. The authors’ patients have statistically significant differences in FEß2M among the two groups, but they could find no differences when monitoring other parameters during 14 days. Thus, one can state that a raise in ß2M excretion is a marker of tubular dysfunction, but does not correlate with the development of clinical nephrotoxi-city. Besides, I do not think that the authors have demonstrated that an increase in the excretion of ß2M, followed by treatment interruption or modification, prevents the appearance of nephrotoxicity, simply because they have not done so in their paper. Statements like this need to be confirmed by means of well-controlled studies. The authors also write that ‘serum aminoglycoside levels are even less sensitive markers of tubular damage than serum creatinine concentrations’, and I do agree with them. Nevertheless, monitoring of AMG levels has not been developed as a measure of tubular dysfunction or necrosis, but as a way to prevent it from appearing. The finding of a valid marker of tubular damage during AMG treatment is certainly both necessary and desirable. Nevertheless, when dealing with patients, we need to know that modifications in the excretion or concentration of the substance will correlate with an increased risk of developing clinical nephrotoxicity. No marker like this has been described yet, although amy-lase-creatinine clearance ratio seems to have a promising future [5]. On the other hand, maintaining of trough serum AMG levels in nontoxic concentrations is a reasonable, though not infallible, way of preventing nephrotoxicity [6–8]. References Assadi, F.K.; Chow-Tung, E.: Renal handling of beta-2-micro-globulin in neonates treated with gentamicin. Nephron 49: 114–118 (1988). Trollfors, B.; Alestig, K.; Krantz, I.; Norrby, R.: Quantitative nephrotoxicity of gentamicin in low doses. J. infect. Dis. 141: 306–309 (1980). Schentag, J.J.; Plaut, M.E.: Patterns of urinary beta-2-micro-globulin excretion by patients treated with aminoglycosides. Kidney int. 77:654–661 (1980).

Beta-2-Microglobulin Excretion in Neonates Treated with Gentamicin