English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chemical dynamics provides quite a number of examples of interesting and useful discrete models. But it catches one's eye that the majority of them are from the field of homogeneous chemistry. Whereas the chemical individuality of solid substances is represented in discrete terms of crystal lattices, the conventional description of solid state reaction dynamics is essentially continual. The recent progress in the theory of random mosaics and theory of planigons opens the way for developing an alternative discrete description in terms of Dirichlet tessellations. In the present paper the two approaches are compared from the angle of meaningful simulation. It seems that this may be of interest not only for chemists but also in the broad context of developing and employing discrete dynamical models

Discrete versus continual description of solid state reaction dynamics from the angle of meaningful simulation