English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Monolithic zirconia is able to achieve certain aesthetic, but its durability in resisting fracture has been questioned, as fractures often originate from margins of restoration. This study determined fracture resistance of highly translucent monolithic zirconia crowns with different margin designs in terms of marginal thickness and collar height.Materials and Methods   Zirconia blanks (Ceramill® Zolid HT + ) were selected for the fabrication of zirconia crowns according to different designs, including varying margin thicknesses (light chamfer, C L ; heavy chamfer, C H ) and collar heights (no collar, N C ; low collar, L C ; high collar, H C ), which resulted in C L N C , C L L C , C L H C , C H N C , C H L C , and C H H C  groups (15 crowns each). The crowns were seated on a metal die and loaded vertically through round end punch ( θ  = 10 mm), contacting with inclined planes of cusp in a testing machine with crosshead speed of 0.2 mm/min until fracture. Videos with a rate of 50 frames/second were used to record fracture. Fracture load (N) and durable period (s) were compared for significant differences using ANOVA and Bonferroni test ( α   =   0.05 ).Results   The mean ± sd of fracture load (N) and durable time (s) were 3211 ± 778 and 212 ± 47 for C L N C ; 3041 ± 1370 and 188 ± 53 for C L L C ; 2913 ± 828 and 192 ± 27 for C L H C ; 4226 ± 905 and 245 ± 35 for C H N C ; 4486 ± 807 and 228 ± 29 for C H L C ; and 4376 ± 1043 and 227 ± 37 for C H H C . This indicated that marginal thickness had a significant influence on load-bearing capacity and durable time ( p  < 0.05). No significant impact of collar height was shown, either on load-bearing capacity or durable time ( p  > 0.05). No interaction between two factors was presented ( p  > 0.05).Conclusions   Heavy chamfer margin provided stronger zirconia crown than light chamfer, but both were capable of withstanding fracture load higher than maximum masticatory force. Neither presence nor absence of collar indicated any impact on strength. Fabrication of zirconia crowns with either heavy or light chamfer margin and either presence or absence of collar, with the consideration of emergence profile, should be considered.

Effect of Marginal Designs on Fracture Strength of High Translucency Monolithic Zirconia Crowns