English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

In view of the varying amounts of information and the difference in information value in sanatorium performance evaluation, Deng’s development relation model based on information difference is proposed herein. Firstly, the definition of panel data on sanatorium performance evaluation and the construction criteria of its optimal vector are given. Simultaneously, the indicators are standardized. In order to objectively highlight the difference of effective information among indicators, the entropy weight method is introduced to determine the weight of performance evaluation indicators in sanatoriums on the basis of traditional Deng’s correlation model avoiding the limitation of subjective effects. Furthermore, the weight of the temporal index is employed to determine the weight of performance evaluation results in different years, based on the new information priority, to dynamically evaluate the development trend of annual sanatorium performance. Finally, the performances of TS, YZ, and XZ sanatoriums are dynamically evaluated by using the proposed new grey relational model. Combined with the weight of time index, the 5-year comprehensive performance value is given. It is found that the performance level of TS sanatorium is the highest followed by YZ sanatorium and XZ sanatorium, which verifies the practicability and effectiveness of the model.

Novel Deng’s Grey Development Relation Model Based on Information Difference and Its Application in Sanatorium Performance Evaluation