English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In the present study, CFD simulation with delayed detached eddy simulation (DDES) is performed to investigate an open cavity at Mach 0.85. A clean cavity and cavity with passive and active control methods, including sawtooth spoiler, flat-top spoiler, crossflow rod, and steady leading edge blowing, are analyzed. The results obtained from all the control methods are compared with clean cavity, and all the flow control methods show positive effect on the overall sound pressure level reduction with the decrement up to 8 dB. The effect of active control on sound pressure level in the cavity is much better than that of passive control, with the magnitude of tone noise decreasing by 20-30 dB. The main focus of this investigation is to test the noise suppression effect by passive and active control methods.

Aeroacoustic Investigation of Passive and Active Control on Cavity Flowfields Using Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation