English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Thanks are due to Dr. Ayyildiz et al. [1] for the constructive questions and suggestions to our publication [2]. We included our answers below. The distributions of strabismus subtypes for all age groups between 2006 and 2011 were listed in Table 1. The surgical criteria for intermittent exotropia were the same for all patients included in the study, which included (1) the degree of deviation (distance and/or near) ≧20 PD and (2) the frequency of deviation occurring more than 1/2 of waking hours, and/or (3) those combined with sensory deficit [3, 4]. Here the sensory deficit included the stereoacuity at near and distance, binocular vision measured through stereoscope, and the sensory fusion measured by Worth 4 Dot test. And the surgical criteria for esotropia in children are mainly based on the effect of deviation with wearing corrected glasses, in patients still with deviation more than 10 PD at near or distance with the corrected glasses [5]. We did evaluate the stereoacuity at distance using Optec 3500 in the study. 722 (32.5%) subjects had 40–480 seconds of arc at distance, 996 (44.8%) had >480 seconds of arc, and 505 (22.7%) were uncooperative to the test. We hope we have addressed all questions and made our result clearer.

Response to: Comment on “Exotropia Is the Main Pattern of Childhood Strabismus Surgery in the South of China: A Six-Year Clinical Review”