English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

In the paper titled “Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences of the 16S rRNA Gene of Novel Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Feces of Human and Bali Cattle,” according to my data, there are too many nucleotides of both S. dysenteriae and E. coli O26:H11 different from the other strains. So logically both strains are placed as outgroup. This fact is difficult to explain from the point of view of the evolution. Taking this in mind I submit the erratum, that is, Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1 without Shigella dysenteriae and E. coli O26:H11 as a comparison. It is also completely concerned with the correction of some words in the specified paragraph. Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1 are corrected here.

Erratum to “Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences of the 16S rRNA Gene of Novel Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Feces of Human and Bali Cattle”