English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

BOTH HOSPITALS AND GOVERNMENTS ARE TAKING IN· creasingly closer looks at the practice of endoscopy ( l ). With a specified amount of money allotted each year for medical and hospital budgets, these and other well defined units are more readily subjec t to medical audit, quality of care evaluations and, with increasing emphasis on outpatien t procedures, cost benefit analysis. The standards of care cannot be imposed by national organizations (2,3) such as the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology; instead each unit is subject to the hospital accreditation committee, which may contain an endoscopy review committee. The fo llowing suggested standards are easily atta inable, and if adhered to by a ll, should create more uniform, h igh quali ty units across the country.

Proposed Standards for Canadian Endoscopy Units in the ’90s