English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We evaluated the ability of ischemic preconditioning to restore function to salvaged myocardium in rabbits. Although ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size, few investigators studying recovery of function after coronary occlusions lasting &gt;/=30 min have reported any mechanical benefit in preconditioned hearts. However, because myocardial function was seldom evaluated beyond 5 h after reperfusion stunning may have masked the benefit. Accordingly, rabbits were chronically instrumented with a pneumatic occluder around a branch of the left coronary artery, a pair of 1-mm ultrasonic crystals in the myocardial territory destined to become ischemic, and electrocardiogram (ECG) leads. One week after surgery the ECG and segment length tracing were recorded at rest, during 30-min occlusion and 1 h of reflow, and again at 24, 48, and 72 h. In ischemically preconditioned rabbits, 5-min coronary occlusion and 10-min reperfusion preceded the long occlusion. The beginning and end of systole were determined by recording the first and second heart sounds with a hand-held precordial microphone. Postmortem infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium chloride. During the 30-min coronary occlusion all segments became nearly akinetic or bulged during systole. After 60 min of reflow there was little return of function in either group. Between 24 and 72 h there was minimal recovery in the control group (segment shortening equals 13.3 +/- 4.1% of baseline), whereas function was much better in preconditioned hearts (44.2 +/- 7.4% of baseline, P &lt; 0.02). Infarct size as a percentage of risk zone was much smaller in preconditioned hearts (10.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 29.7 +/- 1.8%, P &lt; 0.001). Thus there is a gradual recovery of systolic function of reperfused myocardium after a coronary occlusion. Although early mechanical recovery is significantly better after preconditioning, it is much less than would be predicted by the reduction of infarct size.

Smaller infarct after preconditioning does not predict extent of early functional improvement of reperfused heart