English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Well-designed reusable class libraries are often incompatible due to architectural mismatches such as error-handling and composition conventions. We identify fivepragmatic dimensions along which combinations of subsystems must match, and present detailed examples of conflicts resulting from mismatches. Examples are drawn from our experiences of integrating five subsystem-level class hierarchies into an object-oriented hypertext platform. We submit that effective reuse will require that these pragmatic decisions be explicitly identified in descriptions of reusable software. Such descriptions will enable developers to identify and combine subsystems whose architectures are compatible.

When objects collide experiences with reusing multiple class hierarchies