English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In his thesis, "Modelling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals,I1 (1988), Kevin Ashley describes a method for implementing case-based reasoning. The program, HYPO, can retrieve cases from a store of decisions, and analogize them to an entered fact situation. The program not only finds on-point cases, but selects the most on-point case. The program then generates three-ply arguments (argues the most on point case, responds, and then provides a rebuttal to the response). Ashley developped HYPO in the domain of trade secret misappropriation law. In this paper, I consider another area of law, the law governing appeals in criminal cases, and attempt a dimensional analysis. The goal is to learn how domain-sensitive Ashley's success is. This experiment also sheds light on the type of domains which might be more amenable to dimensional analysis.

An attempted dimensional analysis of the law governing government appeals in criminal cases