English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Information presented in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to reliablepublished sources in the form of references. This study examines over 5 millionWikipedia articles to assess the reliability of references in multiple languageeditions. We quantify the cross-lingual patterns of the perennial sources list,a collection of reliability labels for web domains identified andcollaboratively agreed upon by Wikipedia editors. We discover that some sources(or web domains) deemed untrustworthy in one language (i.e., English) continueto appear in articles in other languages. This trend is especially evident withsources tailored for smaller communities. Furthermore, non-authoritativesources found in the English version of a page tend to persist in otherlanguage versions of that page. We finally present a case study on the Chinese,Russian, and Swedish Wikipedias to demonstrate a discrepancy in referencereliability across cultures. Our finding highlights future challenges incoordinating global knowledge on source reliability.

A Comparative Study of Reference Reliability in Multiple Language Editions of Wikipedia