English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We study contention resolution in a multiple-access channel such as the Ethernet channel. In the model that we consider, n users generate messages for the channel according to a probability distribution. Raghavan and Upfal have given a protocol in which the expected delay (time to get serviced) of every message is O(log n) when messages are generated according to a Bernoulli distribution with generation rate up to about 1/10. Our main results are the following protocols: (a) one in which the expected average message delay is O(1) when messages are generated according to a Bernoulli distribution with a generation rate smaller than 1/e, and (b) one in which the expected delay of any message is O(1) for an analogous model in which users are synchronized (i.e., they agree about the time), there are potentially an infinite number of users, and messages are generated according to a Poisson distribution with generation rate up to 1/e. (Each message constitutes a new user.)To achieve (a), we first show how to simulate (b) using n synchronized users, and then show how to build the synchronization into the protocol.

Contention resolution with constant expected delay