English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The most important features of a string matching algorithm are its efficiency and its flexibility. Efficiency has traditionally received more attention, while flexibility in the search pattern is becoming a more and more important issue. Most classical string matching algorithms are aimed at quickly finding an exact pattern in a text, being Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP) and the Boyer-Moore (BM) family the most famous ones. A recent development uses deterministic "suffix automata" to design new optimal string matching algorithms, e.g. BDM and TurboBDM. Flexibility has been addressed quite separately by the use of "bit-parallelism", which simulates automata in their nondeterministic form by using bits and exploiting the intrinsic parallelism inside the computer word, e.g. the Shift-Or algorithm. Those algorithms are extended to handle classes of characters and errors in the pattern and/or in the text, their drawback being their inability to skip text characters. In this paper we merge bit-parallelism and suffix automata, so that a nondeterministic suffix automaton is simulated using bit-parallelism. The resulting algorithm, called BNDM, obtains the best from both worlds. It is much simpler to implement than BDM and nearly as simple as Shift-Or. It inherits from Shift-Or the ability to handle flexible patterns and from BDM the ability to skip characters. BNDM is 30%-40% faster than BDM and up to 7 times faster than Shift-Or. When compared to the fastest existing algorithms on exact patterns (which belong to the BM family), BNDM is from 20% slower to 3 times faster, depending on the alphabet size. With respect to flexible pattern searching, BNDM is by far the fastest technique to deal with classes of characters and is competitive to search allowing errors. In particular, BNDM seems very adequate for computational biology applications, since it is the fastest algorithm to search on DNA sequences and flexible searching is an important problem in that area. As a theoretical development related to flexible pattern matching, we introduce a new automaton to recognize suffixes of patterns with classes of characters. To the best of our knowledge, this automaton has not been studied before.

Fast and flexible string matching by combining bit-parallelism and suffix automata