English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The SPEC CPU Benchmarks are used extensively for evaluating and comparing improvements to computer systems. This ubiquity makes characterization critical for researchers to understand the bottlenecks the benchmarks do and do not expose and where new designs should and should not be expected to show impact. However, in characterization there is a tradeoff between accuracy and reusability: The more precisely we characterize a benchmark’s performance on a given system, the less usable it is across different micro-architectures and varying memory configurations. For SPEC, most existing characterizations include system-specific effects (e.g., via performance counters) and/or only look at aggregate behavior (e.g., averages over the full application execution). While such approaches simplify characterization, they make it difficult to separate the applications’ intrinsic behavior from the system-specific effects and/or lose the diverse phase-based behaviors. In this work we focus on characterizing the applications’ intrinsic memory behaviour by isolating them from micro-architectural configuration specifics. We do this by providing a simplified generic system model that evaluates the applications’ memory behavior across multiple cache sizes, with and without prefetching, and over time. The resulting characterization can be reused across a range of systems to understand application behavior and allow us to see how frequently different behaviors occur. We use this approach to compare the SPEC 2006 and 2017 suites, providing insight into their memory system behaviour beyond previous system-specific and/or aggregate results. We demonstrate the ability to use this characterization in different contexts by showing a portion of the SPEC 2017 benchmark suite that could benefit from giga-scale caches, despite aggregate results indicating otherwise.

A Reusable Characterization of the Memory System Behavior of SPEC2017 and SPEC2006