English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Accessibility research has grown substantially in the past few decades, yetthere has been no literature review of the field. To understand current andhistorical trends, we created and analyzed a dataset of accessibility papersappearing at CHI and ASSETS since ASSETS' founding in 1994. We qualitativelycoded areas of focus and methodological decisions for the past 10 years(2010-2019, N=506 papers), and analyzed paper counts and keywords over the full26 years (N=836 papers). Our findings highlight areas that have receiveddisproportionate attention and those that are underserved--for example, over43% of papers in the past 10 years are on accessibility for blind and lowvision people. We also capture common study characteristics, such as the rolesof disabled and nondisabled participants as well as sample sizes (e.g., amedian of 13 for participant groups with disabilities and older adults). Weclose by critically reflecting on gaps in the literature and offering guidancefor future work in the field.

What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"? A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019