English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Existing performance comparisons of QUIC and TCP compared an optimized QUICto an unoptimized TCP stack. By neglecting available TCP improvementsinherently included in QUIC, comparisons do not shed light on the performanceof current web stacks. In this paper, we can show that tuning TCP parameters isnot negligible and directly yields significant improvements. Nevertheless, QUICstill outperforms even our tuned variant of TCP. This performance advantage ismostly caused by QUIC's reduced RTT design during connection establishment,and, in case of lossy networks due to its ability to circumvent head-of-lineblocking.

A Performance Perspective on Web Optimized Protocol Stacks: TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 vs. QUIC