English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent advances in formal verification techniques enabled the implementation of distributed systems with machine-checked proofs. While results are encouraging, the importance of distributed systems warrants a large scale evaluation of the results and verification practices. This paper thoroughly analyzes three state-of-the-art, formally verified implementations of distributed systems: Iron-Fleet, Verdi, and Chapar. Through code review and testing, we found a total of 16 bugs, many of which produce serious consequences, including crashing servers, returning incorrect results to clients, and invalidating verification guarantees. These bugs were caused by violations of a wide-range of assumptions on which the verified components relied. Our results revealed that these assumptions referred to a small fraction of the trusted computing base, mostly at the interface of verified and unverified components. Based on our observations, we have built a testing toolkit called PK, which focuses on testing these parts and is able to automate the detection of 13 (out of 16) bugs.

An Empirical Study on the Correctness of Formally Verified Distributed Systems