English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Scientometrics is an area recently attracting greater research interest. To a great extent this area has been fertilized by the proposal of the h-index (2005), which represents a measure for the quality and quantity of a researcher's impact. The Perfectionism Index has been recently proposed aiming at differentiating between 'influentials' and 'mass producers' (2015); the former category produces articles, which are (almost all) with high impact, whereas the latter category produces a lot of articles with moderate or no impact at all. In this paper, we record a number of metrics that are of similar nature, i.e. they shed light into these publishing patterns (influentials vs. mass producers). We carry out a correlation analysis to reveal which metrics are describing the above phenomenon in a similar way and, thus, retain the most descriptive features. Finally, we report the results of an experiment with a dataset consisting of the academic staff of Greek Computer Science/Engineering departments.

Bibliometric indices for the assessment of the citation curve tail