English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

An automated solution to horizontal vs. vertical elasticity problem is central to make cloud autoscalers truly autonomous. Today's cloud autoscalers are typically varying the capacity allocated by increasing and decreasing the number of virtual machines (VMs) of a predefined size (horizontal elasticity), not taking into account that as load varies it may be advantageous not only to vary the number but also the size of VMs (vertical elasticity). We analyze the price/performance effects achieved by different strategies for selecting VM-sizes for handling increasing load and we propose a cost-benefit based approach to determine when to (partly) replace a current set of VMs with a different set. We evaluate our repacking approach in combination with different auto-scaling strategies. Our results show a range of 7% up to 60% cost saving in total resource utilization cost of our sample applications and workloads.

A virtual machine re-packing approach to the horizontal vs. vertical elasticity trade-off for cloud autoscaling