English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The use of formal specifications as a basis for specifying functional tests has been discussed by a numbers of researchers with most work focusing on one style of specification or another separately. But is any single style an adequate basis for writing functional tests? The strengths, weaknesses and complementary nature of two popular styles of software specification, model-based and algebraic, are examined as a basis for functional test specification.

A comparison of the model-based & algebraic styles of specification as a basis for test specification