English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In cases where usability is a mission critical system quality it is becoming essential to know whether an evaluation study has identified the majority of existing defects. Previous work has shown that procedures for estimating the progress of evaluation studies have to account for variation in defect visibility; otherwise, harmful bias will happen. Here, a statistical model is introduced for estimating the number of not-yet-identified defects in a study. This approach also supports exact confidence intervals and can easily be adapted to estimate the required number of sessions. The method is evaluated and shown to, in most cases, provide accurate measures. A running example illustrates how practitioners may track the progress of their studies and make quantitatively informed decisions on when to finish.

Controlling the usability evaluation process under varying defect visibility