English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Over the years there have been many outstanding papers which can be assembled under the collective title "Component Failure Analysis." Included in this group are the tube-life prediction tables, the derating charts for condensors, the maximum current versus useful life curves for diodes, etc.; and each company that has a customer service organization has in its files records loosely titled "Plug-in Failures, Their Cause and Cure." An examination of the records will show that in the majority of cases the "active" elements are at fault. Active elements are defined here as those elements which amplify a changed state of their inputs. It would seem, then, that the path to reliability is to remove as many active elements as possible from the system; that is, given some specific design problem, to time-share the active elements as much as possible in keeping with the flexibility required of the overall design. But this philosophy is not without its attendant apparent disadvantage. To use a minimum of active elements, a maximum of switching elements is required. To utilize the minimum active elements concept, a switching element approaching the ideal is required.

A technique for using memory cores as logical elements