English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Inductive Inference is reasoning that justifies change from one state of full belief or absolute certainty to another by adding new information to the initial state that is consistent with it but does not entail it. Inductive inference is, therefore, ampliative. It is also non monotonic. But the deviations from monotonicity differ from those characterized by belief revision according to Alchourron, Gardenfors and Makinson or preferential entailment developed by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor and Lehmann and Magidor. The default reasoning of Reiter resembles ampliative reasoning more closely according to the decision theoretic account of inductive expansion proposed in this essay. The paper seeks to explain the differences and why they occur.

Inductive inference as ampliative and non monotonic reasoning