English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We discuss effects of Majorana CP violation in a model-independent way for agiven phase structure of flavor neutrino masses. To be more predictive, weconfine ourselves to models with $\det(M_\nu)=0$, where $M_\nu$ is a flavorneutrino mass matrix, and to be consistent with observed results of theneutrino oscillation, the models are subject to an approximate $\mu$-$\tau$symmetry. There are two categories of approximately $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetricmodels classified as (C1) yielding $\sin^22\theta_{23} \approx 1$ and$\sin^2\theta_{13} \ll 1$ and (C2) yielding $\sin^22\theta_{23} \approx 1$ and$\Delta m_\odot^2/|\Delta m_{atm}^2|\ll 1$, where $\theta_{23(13)}$ stands forthe mixing of massive neutrinos $\nu_2$ and $\nu_3$ ($\nu_1$ and $\nu_3$) and$\Delta m_ \odot ^2$ ($\Delta m_{atm}^2$) stands for the mass squareddifference for atmospheric (solar) neutrinos. The Majorana phase can be largefor the normal mass hierarchy and for the inverted mass hierarchy with$m_1\approx -m_2$ only realized in (C1) while they are generically small forthe inverted mass hierarchy with $m_1\approx m_2$ in both (C1) and (C2). Theseresults do not depend on a specific choice of phases in $M_\nu$ but hold truein any models with $\det(M_\nu)=0$ because of the rephasing invariance.

Majorana CP Violation in Approximately \mu-\tau Symmetric Models with det(M_\nu)=0