English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Using comoving distance $d_c$ and angular diameter distance $d_A$, werecalculate parameters describing kinematical state of the universe, stillcombining the kinematical model of universe but not relying on dynamicalequations for gravity. Comoving distance $d_c$ comes from Hubble data H(z) andis more reliable. Angular diameter distance $d_A$ comes from SZE (Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect) and X-ray data, and needs calibration. In low redshift case, weuse expansion of relation between luminosity distance and redshift aboutredshift $z$; in high redshift case, we take variable substitution $y=1/(1+z)$,and expand the relation between luminosity distance and redshift about variable$y$ in order to reduce computational errors. Finally we get the more precisevalue of Hubble parameter $H_0=69.13\pm 0.24{\kern 1pt} km{\kern 1pt} \cdot{s^{ - 1}} \cdot Mp{c^{ - 1}}$, corresponding to 0.4\% uncertainty in $68.3\%$confidence region, also deceleration factor $q_0=-0.57\pm0.04 $ andacceleration rate $j_0=1.28\pm0.33$, and their statistical values andprobability graph. We compare the values of ${H_0}$, ${q_0}$, ${j_0}$ withthose obtained from other observation data and model.

The Constraint of H0from Galaxy clusters and Hubble parameter data