English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We inspect the model-independent study of practical Dirac Majorana confusiontheorem (pDMCT) -- a wide spread belief that the difference between Dirac andMajorana neutrinos via any kinematical observable would be practicallyimpossible to determine because of the difference only being proportional tothe square of neutrino mass -- in context of processes that have at least aneutrino antineutrino pair in their final state. We scrutinize the domain ofapplicability of pDMCT and also highlight those aspects that are oftenmisunderstood. We try to clarify some of the frequently used concepts that areused to assert pDMCT as a generic feature irrespective of the process, orobservable, such as the existence of any analytic continuity between Dirac andMajorana neutrinos in the limit mass(neutrino) -> 0. In summary, we illustratethat pDMCT is not any fundamental property of neutrinos, instead, it is aphenomenological feature of neutrino non-observation, depending on models andprocesses.

Practical Dirac Majorana confusion theorem: Issues and Applicability